{"id":30688,"date":"2013-12-27T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-12-27T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/success-story\/regina-v-c-n-2013-30688\/"},"modified":"2013-12-27T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2013-12-27T12:00:00","slug":"regina-v-c-n-2013-30688","status":"publish","type":"success_story","link":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/success-story\/regina-v-c-n-2013-30688\/","title":{"rendered":"Regina v. C (N) 2013"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The client was charged with making false declarations under the Customs Act as a result of the seizure of a luxury automobile by Canada Border Services at the Canada US Border. Neuberger &amp; Partners applied at trial to exclude evidence seized from the client on his cell phone, which was examined while the client was not detained or under investigation. After Neuberger &amp; Partners cross-examined the officer who seized the phone, the Crown stayed all charges.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","success_category":[125,118],"class_list":["post-30688","success_story","type-success_story","status-publish","hentry","success_category-fraud-theft-breach-of-trust-and-financial-crimes","success_category-all-success-stories"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_story\/30688","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_story"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/success_story"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"success_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_category?post=30688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}