{"id":30976,"date":"2013-12-28T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-12-28T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/success-story\/r-v-vu-2013-scc-60-30976\/"},"modified":"2013-12-28T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2013-12-28T12:00:00","slug":"r-v-vu-2013-scc-60-30976","status":"publish","type":"success_story","link":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/success-story\/r-v-vu-2013-scc-60-30976\/","title":{"rendered":"R. v. Vu 2013 SCC 60"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Appellant was charged with Production of Marijuana and acquitted at trial, but the British Columbia Court of Appeal overturned the acquittal. The issue was whether the police needed a search warrant to search through a computer found in the grow op. The Court agreed with the CCLA argument that the police needed a search warrant before searching a computer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","success_category":[118,131],"class_list":["post-30976","success_story","type-success_story","status-publish","hentry","success_category-all-success-stories","success_category-search-warrants"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_story\/30976","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_story"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/success_story"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30976"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"success_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nrlawyers.com\/6ixDev-v2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/success_category?post=30976"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}