Neuberger & Partners LLP named 2026 Boutique Law Firm of the Year by the Canadian Law Awards. See the award →
× HomeOur Services  About Us  Recent SuccessesTestimonialsNews & Videos  Contactفارسی中文
Contact Our Firm

Regina v. Q.M. (2017)

Book a Consultation Now

The criminal justice system can be daunting, but you don’t need to go through it alone. Our Criminal lawyers are here to guide you every step of the way.

Contact Our Firm

 

← More Impaired Driving, Over 80, Dangerous Driving and Other Driving-related Offences success stories

Charge of operating a motor vehicle while Over 80 mg of alcohol in the blood system dismissed after trial due to a violation of the client’s right to contact counsel of choice as guaranteed by section 10 (b) of the Charter. Q.M. when arrested asked to speak with his lawyer. Q.M. spoke English but wanted to speak with a person he had used to fight traffic tickets and who spoke Cantonese. The police officer called and left a message. However within two minutes the officer called Duty Counsel and Q.M. was put on the phone with Duty Counsel. After a short discussion with that lawyer, Q.M. was then turned over to the breath technician and provided samples of his breath resulting in the charge of Over 80. Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger brought an application at trial to exclude the readings based on a violation of his client’s right to speak to his counsel of choice. The Court found a violation and excluded the evidence. According Q.M. was found not guilty.

Contact Our Firm