× HomeOur Services  About Us  Recent SuccessesTestimonialsNews & Videos  Contactفارسی中文
Contact Our Firm

CONSTITUTIONAL APPEALS

Book a Consultation Now

The criminal justice system can be daunting, but you don’t need to go through it alone. Our Criminal lawyers are here to guide you every step of the way.

Contact Our Firm

 

Toronto Constitutional Applications Lawyer

Joseph Neuberger was recently engaged on behalf of Applicants who were suffering from various illnesses requiring the use of medicinal marijuana to aid in their treatment of their disorders. An application was brought to strike down legislation that prohibited and impeded sick Canadians’ access to medicinal marijuana. We were successful in this Application. Please read our newspaper coverage on this Application.

Neuberger & Partners was recently retained to challenge provisions in the criminal code which allow for mandatory DNA databanking.

Joseph Neuberger has been at the forefront of the constitutional challenge to the Bill C-2 amendments to the Criminal Code, including the new “evidence to the contrary” provision for the over 80 offence.

Commonly legislation will affect disproportionately some segment of our community. We are ready, willing and able to advance Constitutional issues in defence of our clients and the pursuit of their rights.

Criminal Law

Over Three Decades Of Practice

Founded in 1993, Neuberger & Partners LLP is a high profile Toronto law firm with exclusive focus on criminal law. Our lawyers have represented clients in simple, complex and high-profile cases throughout the Greater Toronto Area and across Ontario.

About Us

 

Contact Our Firm

NrLawyers Blog

Does an accused have to provide evidence of fabrication when alleging a complainant had motive to lie?

September 28th, 2026

Does an Accused Have to Provide Evidence of Fabrication When Alleging a Complainant Had Motive to Lie? Joseph A....

Read More
When Memory Alone Is Not Enough: R. v. B.B. and the Limits of “Recovered” Recollection

September 23rd, 2026

When Memory Alone Is Not Enough: R. v. B.B. and the Limits of "Recovered" Recollection Joseph A. Neuberger, Diana...

Read More
The Amended Definition of “Intimate Image” Under Section 162.1(2) of the Criminal Code: Closing the Deepfake Gap

September 15th, 2026

The Amended Definition of "Intimate Image" Under Section 162.1(2) of the Criminal Code: Closing the Deepfake Gap Joseph...

Read More
When Does a Child’s Age Explain Inconsistent Testimony—and When Does It Excuse Too Much?

September 13th, 2026

When Does a Child's Age Explain Inconsistent Testimony — and When Does It Excuse Too Much? Joseph A. Neuberger, Michael...

Read More