The criminal justice system can be daunting, but you don’t need to go through it alone. Our Criminal lawyers are here to guide you every step of the way.
Contact Our Firm
Conviction of impaired driving, over 80, or refuse breath sample will result in a significant increase in your automobile insurance premiums. In fact, you may not be able to secure an insurance policy.
Classified as a “high-risk” driver in the Province of Ontario, an individual is usually required to obtain insurance from Facility Association. Facility Association will typically add a surcharge of 100% of the normal premiums for the first three years following a conviction. However, the surcharge can be increased up to 250% if the individual is a repeat offender or if there was multiple convictions relating to the same incident (such as careless driving).
For detailed no-charge 30 minute consultation with an experienced lawyer at Neuberger & Partners LLP, please contact our office online or call 416-364-3111.
Founded in 1993, Neuberger & Partners LLP is a high profile Toronto law firm with exclusive focus on criminal law. Our lawyers have represented clients in simple, complex and high-profile cases throughout the Greater Toronto Area and across Ontario.
About Us
Canadian law prohibits a driver from having a blood alcohol level over 80 milligrams per 100 millilitres of blood. Individuals who cause accidents while driving while impaired can face significant criminal charges...
It is a criminal offence to operate a motor vehicle under the influence of drugs. These charges are usually documented by means of standardized field sobriety tests taken at the roadside under the observation...
Refusing to provide a breath sample is a crime in Ontario and elsewhere in Canada. While these cases may seem cut and dried, in that you either perform the test or you don’t – there may still be other legal and factual...
If you are convicted for refusing to submit to a roadside alcohol screening, you will face the same penalties as for impaired driving or driving over 80. For a first-time offender, these include suspension of your...
The consequences of being found guilty include, most importantly, a criminal conviction for the offence for which you were found guilty. There are additional consequences that are both financial and liberty...
Conviction of a drinking and driving related charge will result in a permanent criminal record. Your photograph and fingerprints will be retained by the RCMP and will become easily accessible by law-enforcement...
Many people often believe that because they have been charged with a drinking and driving related offence that they will ultimately be convicted of the charges and lose their driving privileges. This in...
Classified as a “high-risk” driver in the Province of Ontario, an individual is usually required to obtain insurance from Facility Association. Facility Association will typically add a surcharge of 100% of the normal premiums...
Conviction of impaired driving, over 80, refuse breath sample, or other related charges may result in limited travel abilities. Other countries, including the United States, can prevent entry into their country if the individual...
In any impaired driving case, there may be one or more defences that could lead to the dismissal of the charge or a reduction to a lesser offence. Among the most significant of these is the “Last Drink Defence,” sometimes...
If you wish to regain your license at the expiry of the driving prohibition period, you will need to participate in a mandatory provincial assessment program at your expense. (Approximate fee for this assessment is $500.00.)...
First Offence Conviction Consequences: A minimum fine of $600.00, A minimum one-year driving prohibition period, Possible period of probation
Second Offence Conviction Consequences: A minimum jail...
July 2nd, 2024
In R. v. Patel, 2024 NSCA 40 the Crown unsuccessfully appealed an acquittal on a number of grounds. One rejected ground was...
Read MoreJuly 2nd, 2024
In R. v. Clyde, 2024 ONCA 113 the Court of Appeal overturned a jury conviction due to an improper linkage by the Crown in...
Read MoreJuly 2nd, 2024
Nick Whitfield, Neuberger & Partners LLP In the recent decision R v MSA, 2024 ONCA 477, the Court of Appeal for Ontario...
Read MoreMarch 19th, 2024
Joseph Neuberger and Diana Davison In the recent decision R. v. Kruk, 2024 SCC 7, the Supreme Court refused to recognize a...
Read More
