× Home Our Services   About Us   Recent Successes Testimonials News And Videos   Contact Us 中文 فارسی
Contact Our Firm

November Roundup: Supreme Court Shocks, Digital Evidence Chaos & The Future of Consent

Book Your Free Consultation

The criminal justice system can be daunting, but you don’t need to go through it alone. Our Criminal lawyers are here to guide you every step of the way.

Contact Our Firm

 

November delivered some of the most intense episodes we’ve ever released on Not on Record. From landmark Supreme Court rulings to a digital-evidence acquittal every lawyer should study, our hosts tackled the decisions reshaping sentencing, consent, capacity, and how courts interpret what teens say, and don’t say, online. Catch up on every episode you may have missed.

See all the November episodes below.

EP #189 | Why Mandatory Minimums Are Bad

This episode breaks down Senville, the Supreme Court ruling that struck down a mandatory minimum sentence for child-pornography offences. Joseph and Alper explain why Section 12 matters, how reasonable hypotheticals work, and why judicial discretion protects fairness. They also debunk misconceptions about Friesen and sentencing trends.

Watch now and subscribe.

 

EP #190 | Did the Supreme Court Turn Every Drunk Hookup Into Sexual Assault?

Joseph and Alper deliver their first reactions to Rioux, a 5–4 decision that reframes capacity, blackouts, and memory loss. They dissect the majority’s logic, the risks of relying on assumptions instead of memories, and how this approach could criminalize ordinary adult behaviour involving alcohol.

Watch the full episode & don’t forget to subscribe.

 

EP #191 | “I Only Had Two Drinks” & Canada’s New Sexual Assault Rule

Diana and Daniel break down Rioux from a fresh angle, examining blackout-based complaints, unproven drugging theories, and the growing weight given to a complainant’s beliefs over actual memory. They highlight the ruling’s risks—and the few bright spots—for fairness in sexual-assault law today.

Watch the full video and don’t forget to subscribe!

EP #192 | Never Use Snapchat If You’re Dating; This Case Will Terrify You

This episode unpacks R v J.A., an Ontario acquittal showing why teenage texting and Snapchat are disasters in court. Diana and Joseph explain how overlapping messages, deleted snaps, and relationship dynamics make “silence equals guilt” dangerously wrong—and how judges should analyze digital evidence.

Watch now and subscribe.

Contact The Criminal Lawyers at Neuberger & Partners

Since 1993, Neuberger & Partners has stood beside individuals facing criminal charges. With more than six decades of combined experience, our team is dedicated to upholding due process and safeguarding rights. Every case is met with careful strategy, meticulous advocacy, and unwavering focus on securing the best possible outcome. No matter how serious or complex the allegations, we’re here to defend your future.

Need an expert criminal defence? Call us at 416-364-3111 or contact us here.

Missed an episode of Not On Record? Catch up now and subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@NotOnRecord

Follow us on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and X for more real talk from the courtroom.

Leave a Reply

CONTACT INFORMATION


PHONE: (416) 364-3111
FAX: (416) 364-3271