The criminal justice system can be daunting, but you don’t need to go through it alone. Our Criminal lawyers are here to guide you every step of the way.
Contact Our Firm
False allegations of sexual assault can destroy an innocent person’s life in an instant — yet those who lie rarely face consequences. A look at the cases in the United States and Canada where they did.
Joseph A. Neuberger, Michael P. Bury, and Diana Davison
Neuberger & Partners LLP, Criminal Lawyers Toronto
In the court of public opinion, an accusation of sexual assault can be a life sentence — even for the innocent. Careers evaporate. Families fracture. Reputations, built over decades, collapse overnight. The accused is presumed guilty by headlines, by social media, by coworkers and neighbours who never hear the rebuttal. And when the truth eventually surfaces — when the accusation is shown to have been fabricated — the damage is rarely undone. In a sliver of these cases, however, justice has moved in the other direction.
False allegations of sexual assault are a genuinely contested area. Researchers emphasize that the vast majority of sexual assault reports are truthful, and that fear of disbelief remains a real barrier for genuine victims. Some studies have estimated confirmed false reporting rates at roughly 5% of cases, though the true figure remains debated — some going as high as 41%. (Kanin, E. J. (1994). False rape allegations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23(1), 81–92.)
The estimate of false allegations is generally cited to be 5–8%, but those numbers are based solely on cases in which the allegation is proven to be false by both a confession and corroborating evidence. In summary, the confession must be corroborated to be false, while the allegation itself requires no corroboration — a methodology that vastly reduces the recorded percentage of false allegations.
What is not debated is the catastrophic impact on the men and women caught in false accusations — and the near-total impunity enjoyed by those who make them.
Even if found to be false in a legal proceeding, false sexual accusations can be damaging to the innocent defendant. A false claim can badly tarnish an individual’s reputation and limit their ability to secure employment and housing — even if later determined to be unfounded.
The legal system does have tools to respond. In the United States, filing a false police report is a criminal offence in every state. Defamation law allows falsely accused individuals to sue for reputational damages. Charges of perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements to federal agents can all apply depending on the facts. The problem, as advocates for the accused have long pointed out, is that prosecutors rarely deploy these tools — leaving those who lied facing few or no consequences for the havoc they caused.
The following cases represent some of the rare instances in which false accusers faced criminal charges, civil suits, or both.
Case 01 • Connecticut, USA • 2018
Nikki Yovino falsely accused two Sacred Heart University football players of rape, later admitting she had fabricated the allegations to gain the sympathy of a prospective boyfriend. Both accused men were expelled and their lives upended before the truth emerged. Yovino was prosecuted and sentenced to one year in prison plus two years of probation.
One of the falsely accused men, Malik St. Hilaire, said: “I went from being a college student, to sitting at home being expelled, with no way to clear my name. My life will never be the same.” Prosecutor Tatiana Messina noted that false accusations actively harm real victims by eroding public trust in sexual assault claims.
Case 02 • North Carolina, USA • 2006–2024
Crystal Mangum’s 2006 accusation that three Duke University lacrosse players raped her at an off-campus party became one of the most publicised false accusation cases in American history. The players were indicted, vilified by media and campus activists, and had their season cancelled before the North Carolina Attorney General declared them innocent in 2007, citing no credible evidence and contradictions in Mangum’s story.
District Attorney Michael Nifong was disbarred for misconduct. Mangum was never charged for the false accusation itself, but was later convicted of second-degree murder in an unrelated 2011 killing — and only admitted publicly, in a 2024 podcast interview from prison, that she had fabricated the rape story entirely.
Case 03 • Germany • 2002–2013
A female teacher named Heidi K. accused her male colleague Horst Arnold of raping her in a school biology classroom in 2002. Arnold was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison. He served the full term — denied parole because he refused to admit guilt for something he did not do. Acquitted at a retrial in 2011, Arnold died of heart failure in 2012 before he could see full justice done. In September 2013, Heidi K. was convicted and sentenced to five and a half years in prison. It stands as a sobering reminder of the real harm a lie can cause — and the rarity of real accountability.
Case 04 • Wyoming, USA • 2021
A Wyoming woman was federally prosecuted and sentenced after making false accusations of sexual assault against a man she was attempting to extort. The FBI noted that such false claims “result in the diversion of valuable law enforcement and victim service resources away from actual victims.” Following her prison term, she was ordered to serve 36 months of supervised release. The case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs and FBI Denver.
Case 05 • New York, USA • 2024
In 2021, Yossef Kahlon was accused of rape and aggravated sexual abuse. His mugshot was widely circulated in press releases describing him as a rapist who “brutalized” his accuser, and stories ran in major New York publications. He faced up to 25 years in prison. In October 2023, a Nassau County jury acquitted him entirely. In February 2024, Kahlon filed a civil rights lawsuit alleging defamation, false arrest, and malicious prosecution — naming not only his accuser but Nassau County and its District Attorney’s office. His attorney stated: “The days of men simply enduring false allegations of sexual assault or rape are over.”
5–8%
Estimated confirmed false reporting rate in peer-reviewed meta-analysis of sexual assault cases
99%
Estimated proportion of false accusers who face no legal consequences whatsoever
2,000+
Americans wrongfully convicted since 1989 due to false allegations or perjury
109
Women prosecuted in the UK over five years for crimes related to false rape accusations (to 2014)
Despite the existence of laws against false reports in every U.S. state, criminal charges against false accusers are vanishingly rare. Advocates for the accused argue that prosecutors face a skewed set of incentives: turning away an alleged victim risks public backlash, while charging a false accuser may appear to discourage genuine victims from coming forward. This creates a structural reluctance to act, even when evidence of fabrication is strong.
Civil suits face their own barriers. A falsely accused person must typically wait until criminal proceedings are resolved before filing — and must prove not just that the allegation was false, but that the accuser knew it was false and made it with intent to cause harm. Winning such a case is difficult, but not impossible, as the Kahlon case demonstrates.
“I testified falsely against them by saying that they raped me when they didn’t, and that was wrong, and I betrayed the trust of a lot of other people who believed in me.”
— Crystal Mangum, 2024 Podcast Interview
Canada is not immune to this problem and its legal system grapples with many of the same tensions. Under Section 140 of the Criminal Code of Canada, making a false statement to a peace officer accusing another person of an offence constitutes “public mischief,” an indictable offence carrying up to five years in prison. Perjury (Section 131), making a false affidavit (Section 138), and obstruction of justice (Section 139) can also apply where false accusers testify under oath or manipulate others into giving false statements. In practice, however, these charges are filed rarely — mirroring the same prosecutorial reluctance seen elsewhere.
A landmark 2017 investigation by The Globe and Mail by Robyn Doolittle, called “Unfounded,” found that one in every five sexual assault allegations in Canada is dismissed by police as baseless — yet charges against false accusers almost never follow. Despite framing all “unfounded” designations as a failure of the legal system, some of these designations occurred in cases where a third party made the allegation whilst the alleged victim refused to give a statement or participate in the investigation.
The true number of false allegations will likely never be known and, most certainly in Canada, are rarely prosecuted.
Case 01 • Norfolk County, Ontario • 2019
Ontario Provincial Police charged a 28-year-old woman with public mischief after determining that a sexual assault she reported in December 2018 was based on false information. OPP Const. Ed Sanchuk stated: “We want people to come forward with their allegations. But when people come forward, they have to be truthful.” The case drew national attention to how rarely such charges are laid — illustrating that while the legal tool exists, it remains an exceptional outcome.
Case 02 • Ontario • Department of Justice Canada
In a case documented in a Department of Justice Canada discussion paper, a mother made repeated false allegations of sexual abuse against her former husband during a custody dispute. Police, the Children’s Aid Society, and four independent mental health professionals all concluded the allegations were unfounded. She was charged with public mischief and convicted. The court awarded custody to the father and warned the mother that continued unfounded allegations would result in termination of her access to the child — one of the few Canadian cases where a false accuser faced both criminal conviction and family court consequences.
Case 03 • Ontario • Civil Action
A mother who made false allegations of sexual abuse was sued for defamation alongside a counsellor who had supported those allegations. The court found both jointly liable for $27,000 in defamation damages. The counsellor was additionally held solely liable for $15,000 in aggravated damages for advancing the unfounded claims. The case is notable for holding not only the accuser but a professional enabler financially accountable — a rare outcome in any jurisdiction.
Case 04 • Ontario • Civil Action • Ongoing
Ongoing litigation against the complainant and numerous activists who reiterated alleged defamation related to sexual assault allegations that destroyed Galloway’s career as an author and Chair of the Creative Writing department at UBC. The civil action was brought in 2018 and has still not progressed to trial as of 2026. The original allegations were made in 2015 and proceeded to civil court litigation after Galloway was cleared by UBC’s internal investigation.
The tools exist in Canada to prosecute false accusers, and most complainants are warned about the legal consequences of giving a false statement before their interview is conducted. Beyond public mischief, the Criminal Code provides for perjury charges (s. 131), penalties for making a false affidavit (s. 138), and obstruction of justice charges where an accuser manipulates another person into giving a false statement (s. 139). The maximum sentence for public mischief as an indictable offence is five years.
Despite this, Canada’s Department of Justice has acknowledged that very few charges are laid under any of these sections in cases involving false sexual abuse allegations — due in large part to the difficulty of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the person knew their statement was false at the time. Crown prosecutors face the same structural disincentives as their American counterparts.
Canadian courts have not shied away from calling out the problem. In the 2017 case R. v. Nyznik, Ontario Superior Court Justice Anne Malloy delivered a statement that reverberated across the country’s legal community:
“Although the slogan ‘Believe the victim’ has become popularized of late, it has no place in a criminal trial. To approach a trial with the assumption that the complainant is telling the truth is the equivalent of imposing a presumption of guilt on the person accused of sexual assault.”
— Justice Anne Malloy, Ontario Superior Court, R. v. Nyznik (2017)
1 in 5
Sexual assault allegations in Canada dismissed as “unfounded” by police (Globe and Mail investigation)
14%
Of sexual assaults reported to Canadian police in 2017 deemed unfounded (Statistics Canada)
1 in 3
Cases in the Canadian Registry of Wrongful Convictions involved a crime that never actually occurred
s. 140
Criminal Code public mischief provision — up to 5 years imprisonment, rarely invoked in false accusation cases
None of this should be read as minimising the lived reality of sexual assault survivors. Many people who report sexual violence are telling the truth, and they face enormous barriers — disbelief, trauma, retraumatisation through investigation — that deter others from coming forward at all. False accusations make that environment worse, not just for the men wrongly accused, but for every genuine victim whose claim might now be viewed with additional scepticism.
What these cases argue for is not a presumption against accusers, but a consistent standard: the same seriousness with which we rightly treat sexual assault allegations must extend to the harm caused when those allegations are knowingly fabricated. Accountability is not a zero-sum trade-off between victims’ rights and the rights of the accused. Both can — and must — coexist in a functioning justice system.
The cases above are exceptions. For the most part, false accusers still face little to no legal consequence for conduct that has sent innocent people to prison, cost them their livelihoods, and in some cases their will to live. Until that changes, the accusation itself will continue, for many, to be the punishment.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Neuberger & Partners LLP, Toronto Criminal Lawyers.
